DrumDogs.com Forum Index DrumDogs.com
Drum Dogs Percussion and Drummer Discussion Forum
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Obama Vs. McCain


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DrumDogs.com Forum Index -> THE DOG HOUSE
Author Message
tylerdrummer
Lion King



Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 1019

Location: California, F

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

007, thats not what i was saying,
the arguments, are getting a little worse and worse, anad the Voting, in November is important, but an argument, about it, when people already seem to have their minds made up and dont want to change, wasting that time is pointless, and shouldnt get out of control
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
007david
Deputy Grammar Nazi



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 2480

Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually would say the exact opposite is to be suggested.

Debate is not about bitterness or winning. Debate used to be the forum for entertainment, and more often than not breed discussion later on.

For example, there is an NPR series which is just a 2 hour debate. I listen to them when I'm out on long bike rides, and I love it. There was this one program about performance enhancing drugs in sports, and I went into listening to it having my mind made up (as both an athlete and a fan I'm against it). However, despite my strongly held convictions certain arguments were made that challenged my idea.

Debate and discussion is one of the most important things we can do, especially in matters of such importnace. And you're right, I strongly believe in my positions, but whether you believe what you believe is up to you. The points upon which I argue are ones that are not grounded in fact or are grounded philosophically difficult territory.

Styles and I disagree on at least two things, military and religion. However, we both respect each other's positions because we understand the basis and axioms behind them and realize that each position is upon them merited.

Of course the question I think that raises is, if the difference is mutually respected, what is debated? It is the quality of the differences. Which do I weigh as more important, my libertarian side of "do what you want" or my health side of "your cigarette smoke is acrid"? If I pick the latter, why? That is debate, that is discussion, and it is wholly important.
_________________
So with that title, do I Godwin every thread now?
Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes.
19-0-8-0 8-0 19-0-4 13-17-13 12-15-7-25-25-5-9
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
tylerdrummer
Lion King



Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 1019

Location: California, F

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

congrats yay for you......but we dont need people getting pissed off at other people
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
styles2281
Moderator



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 6632

Location: Manchester, CT

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

007david wrote:
I actually would say the exact opposite is to be suggested.


Me too.

007david wrote:
Debate is not about bitterness or winning. Debate used to be the forum for entertainment, and more often than not breed discussion later on.


Yep. It's why I enjoy participating and reading them. What good are ideas if they can't be challenged?


007david wrote:
Debate and discussion is one of the most important things we can do, especially in matters of such importnace. And you're right, I strongly believe in my positions, but whether you believe what you believe is up to you. The points upon which I argue are ones that are not grounded in fact or are grounded philosophically difficult territory.


Exactly, understanding WHY we believe what we believe is fundamentally key. Usually stemming from some philosophic or religious context or root.

007david wrote:
Styles and I disagree on at least two things, military and religion. However, we both respect each other's positions because we understand the basis and axioms behind them and realize that each position is upon them merited.


Yep. I'm also a capitalist and individualist. I don't like a few of Obama's programs (namely the health care). But, I think he'll do a better job running the country than McCain. I also like his stance on the first amendment and a bit of what little I've read of his stance on the military.

007david wrote:
Of course the question I think that raises is, if the difference is mutually respected, what is debated? It is the quality of the differences. Which do I weigh as more important, my libertarian side of "do what you want" or my health side of "your cigarette smoke is acrid"? If I pick the latter, why? That is debate, that is discussion, and it is wholly important.


Agreed.
_________________
"One day I feel I'm on top of the world
And the next it's falling in on me
I can get back on, I can get back on
One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel
And the next it's rolling over me
I can get back on, I can get back on "
- Neil Peart, Rush, Snakes and Arrows, Far Cry, 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
styles2281
Moderator



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 6632

Location: Manchester, CT

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tylerdrummer wrote:
congrats yay for you......but we dont need people getting pissed off at other people


Then people shouldn't get pissed off at other people. People should learn to control their own emotions and accept that other people have other opinions. If we spend all of our time worrying about pissing others off NOTHING would ever get done or said.
_________________
"One day I feel I'm on top of the world
And the next it's falling in on me
I can get back on, I can get back on
One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel
And the next it's rolling over me
I can get back on, I can get back on "
- Neil Peart, Rush, Snakes and Arrows, Far Cry, 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
007david
Deputy Grammar Nazi



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 2480

Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly. I can't remember who said it (and if no one did I'm taking credit) but "debate is the art of being passionately stoic".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
phantompong
Lion



Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 924

Location: on the side of the world

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

007david wrote:
tylerdrummer wrote:
wo, guys like mellow down, its not that big of a thing

He's right; it's only the most important election the US has.


Correction: it's only the most important election in the world.
_________________
If you don't like it, you can just *Golly Gee* off! - Keith Moon's last words

Drummers are subject to physical laws of nature. One of them states that if you drop a wing nut, it will roll under the bass drum. - Roy Burns
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Exzilibus
Show Poodle



Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 266

Location: Suffern, New York

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

styles2281 wrote:
Then people shouldn't get pissed off at other people. People should learn to control their own emotions and accept that other people have other opinions. If we spend all of our time worrying about pissing others off NOTHING would ever get done or said.


Well said. I've always been against Politically Correct behavior and its not because I want to offend anybody or anything like that...its more along the lines of hating the feeling of sounding fake. I understand that everyone can EASILY offend everyone else either by words, behavior, how they dress, political views, etc. Even people who ARE very politically correct have thoughts that can offend others...so trying to walk on eggshells around each other and focusing on being NICE to each other seems fake to me. I 100% agree with Styles that people should be more tolerant of views that are different from theirs rather than change our entire language to be super nice and fake.

Speaking of politically correct behavior...I know this is random but I'm hungover so deal with it! Smile

I can't stand terms like "African-American" instead of black....and "Caucasian" instead of white. I think it goes along with my fake point I was making above and I don't know ANY black/white people that use those terms to describe themselves unless their job requires it.

Using that same logic...we don't need short people saying they're "vertically challenged" or Janitors saying they're "custodial engineers" either. I don't understand what the benefit of that type of language is.

I personally believe the world is better off if you are frank and up front about everything and call it like it is. You can STILL stay away from offending people just by leaving out foul language or name-calling or intensely ignorant viewpoints. I think that's a WAY better system than walking on eggshells.
_________________
www.myspace.com/thenewaffliction
www.myspace.com/delianleague
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
drumminelsewhere
Moderator



Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 3699


PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But isn't that what makes the country great? the idea that we can all have different views and not be penalized for it? Make no mistake there are certain view points that I will not accept as the right or "moral" thing to do. Now that doesn't mean that I have to force MY viewpoint on those people but they certainly don't have the right to force me to accept it as ok and normal.
_________________
Not for fame or praise
Or to make noise with hate,
But to carry the torch in his mouth,
Strings create a flaming sound,
Thunderous beats crack the heart of our Savior
And His love pours out

www.myspace.com/redseaaffair


"All your sins, can be forgiven, all of this was always free, Jesus loves without condition, this is what, freedom means to me"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drumminelsewhere
Moderator



Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 3699


PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok I haven't gotten time to make a real post until now so here it goes.


These are some of my thoughts on the whole subject. Feel free to disagree.
I don't care what it's about, I don't care if you support the war or not, if you want Government controlled healthcare or not. I'm not supporting anyone who wants to take away my freedoms and choices and make me do what they want. I don't want to be forced to pay for anyone's medical needs period. In fact if the government left me alone and I had more of my own money I'd give away just that much more of it. But because I get taxed out my butt and oil is so insanely high for whatever reason and I have to pay 140-200 a week in gas I don't have extra money to spend.

All the idea of big government accomplishes is control. "lets ban trans fat in NYC! for the good of people" are you kidding me? Let me make my own freaking choice, if I want to eat a greasy fatty hamburger that's my decision and no one else s. That's my whole big problem with liberalism at it's core. It always comes down to more control by the government.


I'm ALL for alternative fuels, I'm all for helping people in need (keyword, NEED, not people who mooch), I'm all for cleaner energy and cars that run off freaking air. And as a human being who has free will I don't want anyone imposing on my freedoms, that isn't their decision and it's not my job to control anyone else.


Also I know this isn't a big issue, but to me it is. I can't support anyone who believes that killing babies is ok. Yes I know it's a law but I know that McCain doesn't agree with it. (I'm not going to debate abortion in this thread, this is a personal view)
_________________
Not for fame or praise
Or to make noise with hate,
But to carry the torch in his mouth,
Strings create a flaming sound,
Thunderous beats crack the heart of our Savior
And His love pours out

www.myspace.com/redseaaffair


"All your sins, can be forgiven, all of this was always free, Jesus loves without condition, this is what, freedom means to me"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DrumHead
Tiger Cub



Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 784

Location: Apex, North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zaphod Breeblebrox is my man. Less faces.
_________________
What you got back home, little sister, to play your fuzzy warbles on? I bet you got, say, pitiful, portable picnic players. Come with uncle and hear all proper! Hear angels' trumpets and devils' trombones. You are invited!

http://www.myspace.com/kevinsplacespace
http://www.myspace.com/resonance08
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DrumHead
Tiger Cub



Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 784

Location: Apex, North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seriously....


in recent years I hear a lot... the only thing you should consider for president is foreign policy because that's really the only thing he has control over.

I agree that has been true recently.

But it shouldn't be. We need a leader. John Kennedy said we would go to the moon not because it was easy but because it was hard.

Right now we need someone to say we will stop importing oil. And use government resources to at least help do that. Electric vehicles is the ticket. No fuel dependency but ability to use whatever generating source available to charge up - ethanol, methanol, gas, wind, solar, geo, hydro, etc

that one issue is causing the wars and the economic issues domestically. I will admit that if my scenario came true many upheavals and strife would be caused worldwide but its tough love and something way past due.
_________________
What you got back home, little sister, to play your fuzzy warbles on? I bet you got, say, pitiful, portable picnic players. Come with uncle and hear all proper! Hear angels' trumpets and devils' trombones. You are invited!

http://www.myspace.com/kevinsplacespace
http://www.myspace.com/resonance08
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
drumminelsewhere
Moderator



Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 3699


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once again though, electric cars aren't ready to take over the normal cars. The technology just isn't there at all....yet, once it is lets do it, but until then we gotta use what we got.
_________________
Not for fame or praise
Or to make noise with hate,
But to carry the torch in his mouth,
Strings create a flaming sound,
Thunderous beats crack the heart of our Savior
And His love pours out

www.myspace.com/redseaaffair


"All your sins, can be forgiven, all of this was always free, Jesus loves without condition, this is what, freedom means to me"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DrumHead
Tiger Cub



Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 784

Location: Apex, North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

drumminelsewhere wrote:
Once again though, electric cars aren't ready to take over the normal cars. The technology just isn't there at all....yet, once it is lets do it, but until then we gotta use what we got.


Yes, it certainly is here. Google Tesla Motors. A few venture capitalists Bill Gates types started this company and they are making a roadster that runs at about 2 cents a mile and outperforms a Corvette.

And the technology advances every day. They aren't even using lithium polymer batteries, which have even greater energy density (energy/weight).

There are 100s of things a leader with vision could drive to get this to critical mass. Economic incentives beyond the drops in the bucket that currently exist, mandates on government fleet vehicles, preference to contractors using the technology, etc.
_________________
What you got back home, little sister, to play your fuzzy warbles on? I bet you got, say, pitiful, portable picnic players. Come with uncle and hear all proper! Hear angels' trumpets and devils' trombones. You are invited!

http://www.myspace.com/kevinsplacespace
http://www.myspace.com/resonance08
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
tylerdrummer
Lion King



Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 1019

Location: California, F

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree with DEW, even though the car will be there who says its going to last, i dont want to spend a bunch of cash for a car that we dont know what will happen to them in ten years. like alot of the hybrid cars, it was a great idea, they need to fix it a little bit because after a few years, that little battery dies, and you have to pay another 10 grand.
we need to fix what we have know before going into ugly little electric buzzing cars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DrumDogs.com Forum Index -> THE DOG HOUSE All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 

© 2001-2007